People v. Trevino
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction of first degree burglary of an inhabited recreational vehicle (RV), in violation of Penal Code 459, 460. Defendant argued that because an RV, statutorily referred to as a "house car," is not specifically included in section 460, subdivision (a), his first degree burglary conviction cannot stand. The court concluded, however, that the absence of the words "recreational vehicle" or "house car" from section 460, subdivision (a) is not determinative, and that the phrase "inhabited dwelling house," as used in that subdivision, includes an inhabited RV. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.