People v. Araujo
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed an order denying a post-judgment motion to vacate her conviction by guilty plea to first degree residential burglary, claiming that the trial court failed to properly advise her of the immigration consequences of the conviction when the change of plea was entered. The court concluded that the appeal was without merit, even bordering on being frivolous. In this case, given defendant's criminal history, the record made when she entered into the negotiated disposition, and the fact that she voluntarily returned to Mexico to avoid federal criminal prosecution in 2009, the showing of unawareness of deportation seems as disingenuous to the court as it must have been to the trial court. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.