People v. Mateo
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction and sentence for continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 years old. Defendant's conviction was based in part on expert testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS). In the published portion of the court's opinion, the court held that the trail court had no sua sponte duty to give the pattern jury instruction explaining the limited purpose of expert testimony on the CSAAS. The instruction need only be given if requested. The court rejected defendant's remaining claims and affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.