People v. Falaniko
Annotate this CaseDefendant challenged his convictions arising out of three separate shooting incidents. The court affirmed defendant's convictions for murder in count 1, attempted murder in counts 4, 9 and 10, and shooting at an occupied motor vehicle and at an inhabited dwelling in counts 5 and 8. However, the court agreed with defendant that the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction that used the disjunctive "or" which permitted the jury to convict defendant for attempted murder without finding that he had the requisite intent to kill each victim. Because this error was prejudicial, the court reversed as to counts 2, 3, 6, and 7. Furthermore, defendant contends, and the Attorney General concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing restitution and parole revocation fines on each count of conviction. Accordingly, the court reversed the trial court's restitution and parole revocation orders.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.