California v. Isom
Annotate this CaseA jury found defendant-appellant Jesse Isom guilty of (1) two counts of burglary (with forgery the crime underlying the burglary convictions); and (2) one count of possessing methamphetamine. Defendant used an altered receipt when returning items for a cash refund at Walmart. Defendant admitted suffering: (1) three prior convictions that resulted in prison terms; and (2) one prior strike conviction. The trial court sentenced defendant to prison for a term of four years. Defendant raised three issues on appeal, contending: (1) Walmart’s right to control its receipts was not a legal right protected by the forgery statute, and therefore, defendant’s burglary convictions had to be reversed because defendant’s actions did not damage any legal right; (2) there was a lack of substantial evidence to support the finding that he intended to defraud Walmart; and (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. Finding no reversible error, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.