In re P.R.
Annotate this CaseAshley M., mother of minor P.R., appealed juvenile court orders terminating her parental rights. Her sole contention was that the court's decision was not supported by substantial evidence that there was good cause to deviate from the adoption placement preferences of the Indian Child Welfare Act. However, the Court of Appeal found that Ashley did not argue that her parental rights were improvidently terminated. Because her parental rights have been terminated, and she made no argument as to how alleged placement errors might be related to the termination decision, she lacked standing to challenge matters related to the minor’s placement. Her appeal was dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.