California v. Jackio
Annotate this CaseDefendant Lawrence Jackio was convicted of attempted murder and other crimes associated with a home invasion and sentenced to both determinate and indeterminate terms in state prison. On appeal, he argued that his waiver of his right to counsel, under which he represented himself at trial, was inconsistent with his Sixth Amendment rights because the trial court did not outline the possible terms of imprisonment for the various crimes and enhancements charged against him. Instead, the trial court simply advised defendant that he risked life in prison if he was convicted. In the published part of this opinion, the Court of Appeal concluded that, under the circumstances, the trial court’s advisement adequately warned defendant of the risks of self-representation. In the unpublished part of this opinion, the Court found no merit in defendant’s remaining contentions. The Court therefore affirmed the judgment but remanded to the trial court to correct a clerical error in the abstract of judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.