Williams V. Super. Ct.
Annotate this CasePlaintiff filed suit against his employer, Marshalls, alleging claims under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), Lab. Code 2698-2699.5. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion to compel discovery in part, compelling Marshalls to produce contact information for the employees only at its Costa Mesa store and denied production of the contact information of employees at Marshalls' other 128 stores statewide. The court concluded that discovery of Marshalls' employees' contact information statewide is premature; employee privacy interests outweigh plaintiff's need for disclosure at this time; and, therefore, the court denied the writ of mandate.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.