People v. Mendoza
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of two counts of sexual intercourse or sodomy with a child 10 years old or younger (counts 1 & 2), oral copulation or sexual penetration with a child 10 years old or younger (count 3), lewd act upon a child (count 4), and possession of matter depicting a minor engaging in sexual conduct. The court concluded that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct on the lesser included offenses of attempted sexual intercourse, attempted sodomy, or attempted oral copulation. The court also concluded that substantial evidence supported the conviction for possession of child pornography. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.