California v. Garcia
Annotate this CaseDefendant Armando Garcia appealed the denial of his petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act). The court based the denial on its finding that defendant posed “an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety” if released, citing as grounds for its decision: (1) defendant’s “nonstop criminal history” that included violent felonies (two robberies); (2) two escapes from confinement; (3) an 18-year prison commitment shortly after which he exhibited a weapon; and (4) the relatively recent timing of his current offense (receiving stolen property) in 2007. Defendant argued on appeal that the Act was unconstitutionally vague because the term “unreasonable risk of danger to public safety” was not adequately defined. The Court of Appeal disagreed and affirmed the trial court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.