People v. Youn
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed from the denial of his motion to suppress, contending that a warrantless draw of his blood violated the Fourth Amendment as construed in Missouri v. McNeely and Schmerber v. California. An officer asked a nurse to take draw blood from defendant after defendant was involved in a serious vehicle collision and appeared to be under the influence of a drug stimulant. The court concluded that the blood draw was conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent within the meaning of Davis v. United States, and therefore was not subject to the exclusionary rule. Accordingly, the court affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.