People v. Archer
Annotate this CaseAfter defendant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, he argued on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea because it misstated the maximum term of imprisonment he faced if he went to trial. The court concluded that the failure to explain to defendant the possible effects Penal Code section 654 might have on his sentence was not a mistake, let alone a mistake that overcame defendant's exercise of free judgment, nor did it cause defendant to operate in ignorance when he entered his plea. The court affirmed the judgment, concluding that defendant failed to met his burden of demonstrating that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion, and that defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at the time he entered his guilty plea.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.