Silvaco Data Sys. v. Intel Corp.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 5/27/10 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SILVACO DATA SYSTEMS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. H032895 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV031946) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING INTEL CORPORATION, NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT Defendant and Respondent. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 29, 2010, be modified as follows: 1. On page 3, footnote 2, second full paragraph beginning with A second cause and ending with index purpose is deleted and the following paragraph is inserted in its place: A second cause of overkill is that each of the appendix s 27 volumes includes an index to the entire appendix. This would be a welcome convenience if not for the fact that the index is 103 pages long a bulk that, replicated 27 times, consumes more than one-third of the appendix. This remarkable feat is achieved by listing not only every distinct filing (see Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.144(b)(1), 8.124(d)(1), 8.122), but every exhibit or attachment to each filing, resulting in page after page of references to exhibit titles, including lodged authorities (see preceding paragraph). This level of detail, when judiciously reserved for critical documents, might be of considerable assistance in navigating a complex record. However, when it enlarges an already overblown record to the present extent, it largely defeats the index s purpose. There is no change in the judgment. Appellant s petition for rehearing is denied. Dated: ____________________________________ RUSHING, P.J. WE CONCUR: _________________________________ PREMO, J. _________________________________ ELIA, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
