1-800-Got Junk? LLC v. Super. Ct.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 11/19/10 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 1-800-GOT JUNK? LLC, Petitioner, B221636 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC373596) v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Respondent; MILLENNIUM ASSET RECOVERY, INC., Real Party in Interest. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 21, 2010, be modified as follows: 1. On page 5, line 3, following the sentence which concludes with the word Washington, insert within the quote, in brackets, the following new footnote as footnote [4], which will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes: 4 The franchise agreement plainly calls for the application of the laws of the State of Washington. Therefore, we reject Got Junk s contention the choice of law provision merely requires the contract be construed and interpreted according to Washington law. [There is no change in the judgment.]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.