P. v. King

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 5/17/10 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. IAN M. KING, Defendant and Appellant. B210909 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA323140) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed on April 16, 2010, be modified as follows: On page 29, in the first sentence of the last paragraph in the main text (which begins First, Nicole s testimony makes it abundantly clear . . . ), the words at trial shall be inserted between the words testimony and makes. The first sentence of the last paragraph starting on page 29 (and continuing on page 30) shall then read in its entirety: First, Nicole s testimony at trial makes it abundantly clear that throughout the time she was detained, King took full advantage of his position of authority, using it as nothing less than a veiled threat. On page 11, in the third sentence of the first full paragraph (beginning Witnesses at trial testified and ending was 10 to 12 minutes. ) the number 10 shall be replaced with the number 7. The resulting sentence shall then read as follows: Witnesses at trial testified that the fastest estimated travel time between those two LAUSD campuses 12 miles apart from one another was 7 to 12 minutes. There is no change in the judgment. Appellant King s Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION. JOHNSON, J. ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J. 2 CHANEY, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.