Lucky United Properties Investment v. Lee
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 6/28/10 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE LUCKY UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT, INC., et al., Cross-Complainants and Respondents, v. ALBERT LEE, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. A124965 ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 454503) BY THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 28, 2010, be modified as follows: On page 25, the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified by replacing In its respondent s brief, Lucky now morphs his with Nor could Lucky morph its, so that the sentence now reads: Nor could Lucky morph its Civil Code section 1479 argument into a claim that it wanted to direct its payment to the principal portion of the debt arising from the August 20 Order, as opposed to the portion attributable to the interest that had accrued on the August 20 Order. Typographical errors will be corrected upon publication in the official reports. The modification effects no change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied. Date________________________ ________________________, P.J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
