P. v. Campos
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 12/7/07 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, B191256 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA027171) v. ROBERT A. CAMPOS, Defendant and Appellant. __________________________________ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, B192771 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA027171) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION WILLIAM EDWARD HOGAN, Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT:* It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 14, 2007, be modified as follows: 1. On page 20, line 1, the first full sentence, the words the Court of Appeal are changed to the Supreme Court. The sentence is modified to read as follows: In rejecting that argument, the Supreme Court explained that in order for the jury to convict defendant of the attempted murder of the baby, it had to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he acted with intent to kill that victim, i.e., that he purposely shot into the vehicle with a deliberate intent to unlawfully take away [the baby s] life [citation] or knowledge that his act of shooting into the vehicle would, to a substantial certainty, result in the baby s death. [Citation.] . . . Under the case law . . . , evidence that defendant purposefully discharged a lethal firearm at the victims, both of whom were seated in the vehicle, one behind the other, with each directly in his line of fire, can support an inference that he acted with intent to kill both. [Citations.] (Id. at p. 743.) There is no change in judgment. *DOI TODD, Acting P. J. ASHMANN-GERST, J. CHAVEZ, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
