P. v. Super. Ct. (Humberto S.)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 12/20/06 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, No. B193386 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. TJ15419) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HUMBERTO S., Real Party in Interest. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 22, 2006, be modified as follows: 1. On page 5, the last line before section entitled DISCUSSION , add the following footnote: The District Attorney s office filed a petition for rehearing in this Court asserting, among other arguments, that the disqualification order was overly broad because it will result in the recusal of over 100 prosecutors. The ________________________________________________________________________ JOHNSON, Acting P. J. WOODS, J. ZELON, J record before this court contains no evidence that supports that assertion. 2. On page 9, first full paragraph, third line from the end, delete the word so , so the sentence reads one-sided in favor of the prosecution and victims . . . . There is no change in the judgment. Petitioner s petition for rehearing is denied. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.