Corder v. Corder

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 10/25/05 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SHAOPING CORDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LISA R. CORDER, G033608 (Super. Ct. No. 01CC10590) ORDER MODIFYING DISSENTING OPINION Defendant and Respondent. LISA R. CORDER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 01CC00182) SHAOPING CORDER, Defendant and Appellant. The dissenting opinion filed in this case on September 26, 2005 should be modified in the following respects. (1) Pursuant to section 68902 of the Government Code and page iv of the California Style Manual, the second sentence of footnote 10 on page 33 of the slip opinion should be deleted, and citations of cases subsequent to the first citation of such case which give the year of the decision should be converted to the supra, [volume and reporter] at [first page or point page, as the case may be] format. (2) In footnote 24 of the dissent on page 55 of the slip opinion, the following citation should appear after the first and only sentence making up that footnote: (See Estate of Armstrong (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 1, 10 [ Oral declarations of a party whose lips are sealed by death is evidence of the weakest kind and should be received with caution. [Citation.] It is particularly unconvincing when the declaration is presented through a witness with a substantial pecuniary interest in the probative effect of the decedent s declaration. ].) SILLS, P. J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.