Medina v. Bd. of Retirement
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 11/4/03 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR ALFONSO J. MEDINA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, B161881 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS068944) v. BOARD OF RETIREMENT, LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION et al., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendants and Respondents. THE COURT:* It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 18, 2003, which was certified for publication on October 20, 2003, be modified as follows: 1. On page 8, after the first sentence of the second full paragraph ending with to be doing add the following sentence: Here, respondents cannot be estopped from reclassifying appellants as general members, because they did not possess the authority to continue to classify appellants as safety members after they became district attorneys even though they appeared to be doing so. 2. Following the new sentence set forth above, add Cf. before the citation to Crumpler v. Board of Administration, supra, etc. There is no change in the judgment. __________________________________________________________________ *VOGEL (C.S.), P.J. HASTINGS, J. 2 CURRY, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
