Furia v. Helm

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 9/10/03 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE DAVID FURIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HUGH N. HELM III, Defendant and Respondent. A100102 (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. 226986) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING CERTIFYING OPINION FOR PUBLICATION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] BY THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 29, 2003, be modified in the following particular: On page 15, line 2, the word improperly is changed to allegedly so the sentence reads: Although Helm allegedly concealed from Furia the fact that he did not intend to be neutral when attempting to mediate the dispute, Furia may not now reverse himself and claim that at Helm s suggestion he withdrew from the remodeling project, and he has alleged no other causal link for his asserted damages. There is no change in the judgment. The request to withdraw certification for publication is denied. Trial court: Sonoma County Superior Court Trial judge: Hon. Raymond Giordano Counsel for plaintiff and appellant: John Jack Mavredakis Counsel for defendant and respondent: Victor C. Thuesen A100102, Furia v. Helm 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.