Friedman v. So. CA Permanente
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 9/24/02 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE JEROLD DANIEL FRIEDMAN, B150017 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BC224249) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP et al., [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendants and Respondents. The opinion filed September 13, 2002, is ordered modified as follows: page 1 asterisk footnote reads, Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, parts I, IIA, IIB1-IIB6, and III . . . . the footnote should read, Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, parts I, IIA, IIB, IIC1-IIC6, and III . . . . On page 36, where it reads, [The portions of this opinion that follow (parts B7 and C) . . . . should read, [The portions of this opinion that follow (parts C7, D and E) . . . . On page 37, heading C should read as D On page 40, heading D should read as E No change in judgment. ________________ TURNER, P.J. _________________ GRIGNON, J. 2 __________________ ARMSTRONG, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
