Valerio v. Andrew Youngquist Const.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 12/03/02 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE BART VALERIO, Plaintiff and Respondent, A094096 v. ANDREW YOUNGQUIST CONSTRUCTION, Defendant and Appellant. (Solano County Super. Ct. No. L011750) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] BY THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 27, 2002, be modified as follows. On page 10, delete the third sentence of the first full paragraph, which begins, Accordingly there was reason . . . and replace with the following: Accordingly, there was no reason for the court to interpret the admission in order to resolve an ambiguity or reflect Valerio s reasonable understanding of the facts. This modification does not effect a change in judgment. _____________________________ P.J. Trial court: Solano County Superior Court Trial judge: Honorable David Power Willet & McKay, Louis James Willett for Respondent and Plaintiff. Francis Thomas Donohue for Defendant and Appellant. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.