STATE OF ARIZONA v. KING NATHANIEL RAFFAEL YATES (pdf)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. KING NATHANIEL RAFFAEL YATES, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2022-0016 Filed October 27, 2022 THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. NOT FOR PUBLICATION See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c)(1); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.19(e). Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County No. CR20171907001 The Honorable Howard Fell, Judge Pro Tempore AFFIRMED COUNSEL Robert A. Kerry, Tucson Counsel for Appellant STATE v. YATES Decision of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION Chief Judge Vásquez authored the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Eckerstrom and Judge Cattani concurred. V Á S Q U E Z, Chief Judge: ¶1 Following a jury trial in 2021, appellant King Yates was convicted of first-degree murder. 1 The trial court sentenced Yates to natural life in prison, to be served consecutively to a natural life term in another matter. 2 Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530 (App. 1999), stating he has reviewed the record and has found “no tenable issue to raise on appeal.” Counsel has asked us to search the record for fundamental error. Yates has not filed a supplemental brief. ¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, see State v. Delgado, 232 Ariz. 182, ¶ 2 (App. 2013), the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding of guilt, see A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(1). The evidence presented at trial showed that in April 2017, a corrections officer at the Pima County Jail found the deceased victim, who was Yates’s cellmate, lying on the floor of their shared cell. The victim, who died of strangulation, also sustained blunt force injuries to his head and neck, contusions and lacerations to his face, a fractured jaw, loose teeth, and contusions and abrasions to his arms and legs. The victim was not strangled by hand, but could have been strangled with a strip of a bed sheet; a strip of the sheet from Yates’s bunk was noted as missing. Although video associated with the case during the relevant time period included footage 1 After finding Yates incompetent to stand trial but restorable, the trial court found him competent to stand trial following proceedings pursuant to Rule 11, Ariz. R. Crim. P., and competent to represent himself at trial with advisory counsel. 2Yates was convicted of first-degree murder in 2020 for an offense he committed approximately five months before the underlying offense. We affirmed his conviction and sentence on appeal in that matter. State v. Yates, No. 2 CA-CR 2020-0101 (Ariz. App. Mar. 15, 2022) (mem. decision). 2 STATE v. YATES Decision of the Court of the victim and Yates leaving their cell to retrieve their breakfast trays, which the victim later returned, it revealed no other inmate movement to or from their cell, to which the door had otherwise remained secure. We further conclude the sentence imposed is within the statutory range. See A.R.S. §§ 13-752(A), 13-1105(D). ¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for fundamental, reversible error and have found none. Therefore, Yates’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
