Garron Bethel v. State of Alabama

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 02/04/2011 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may be made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2010-2011 CR-10-0176 Garron Bethel v. S t a t e o f Alabama Appeal WINDOM, from B u t l e r C i r c u i t (CC-98-7.65) Judge. AFFIRMED BY U N P U B L I S H E D MEMORANDUM. Welch, P.J., concurs. opinion. Court Kellum, J . , concurs s p e c i a l l y , with CR-10-0176 KELLUM, J u d g e , concurring I write specially Garron Bethel's challenging stolen cards h i s 1998 property and sixth specially. to note Rule that this 3 2 , A l a . R. a c t i o n a p p e a r s t o be Crim. P., convictions f o r third-degree and two his resulting counts illegal concurrent possession sentences to imprisonment. I b e l i e v e that a l l o w i n g Bethel t o f i l e petitions either for postconviction relief precluded resources. 531 Strickland, frivolous situated Crim. S o . 2 d 323 like (Ala. 792 F . 2 d 1 0 6 9 inmates. merit wastes I would encourage sanctions litigation App. without Therefore, consider adopting State, or i n which those Crim. petition receiving of credit 20 years' multiple h i s claims scarce judicial the c i r c u i t court to proposed i n Peoples App. 1988), and Procup (11th C i r . 1986), to prevent on t h e p a r t o f B e t h e l a n d o t h e r See Ex p a r t e Thompson, 2009). 2 are v. v. future similarly 38 S o . 3 d 119 ( A l a .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.