Robert Gill v. State of Alabama

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 02/04/2011 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may be made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2010-2011 CR-10-0051 Robert Gill v. S t a t e o f Alabama Appeal WINDOM, from Morgan C i r c u i t (CC-95-43.67) Judge. AFFIRMED BY U N P U B L I S H E D MEMORANDUM. Welch, P.J., concurs. opinion. Court Kellum, J . , concurs s p e c i a l l y with CR-10-0051 KELLUM, J u d g e , concurring I write specially Robert Gill's challenging his eighth merit Rule sentence imprisonment without relief Gill wastes A l a . R. Crim. P., petition scarce proposed Crim. App. 1 988 ) , (11th C i r . 1986), Thompson, are either judicial like of G i l l as a h a b i t u a l f e l o n y o f f e n d e r h i s claims the c i r c u i t parte 32, a c t i o n a p p e a r s t o be multiple petitions encourage the p a r t that this to and life the p o s s i b i l i t y of parole. I believe that to file i n which those to note h i s 1996 c o n v i c t i o n f o r f i r s t - d e g r e e r o b b e r y resulting allowing specially. court and o t h e r or Therefore, to consider adopting without I would sanctions v . S t a t e , 531 S o . 2 d 323 ( A l a . Procup to prevent precluded resources. i n Peoples and for postconviction v. Strickland, future similarly 38 S o . 3 d 119 (Ala. 2 7 92 frivolous F.2d litigation s i t u a t e d inmates. Crim. App. 2009). 1069 on See E x

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.