M.N. v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 06/05/2020 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2019-2020 2190083 and 2190084 S.C.T. v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources. Appeals from Mobile Juvenile Court (JU-18-488.02 and JU-18489.02). 2190131 and 2190132 M.N. v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources. Appeals from Mobile Juvenile Court (JU-18-488.02 and JU-18489.02). THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. 2190083 –- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. 2190084 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; § 1215-319, Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Fann, 810 So. 2d 631, 633 (Ala. 2001); Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990); T.L.S. v. Lauderdale Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 119 So. 3d 431, 439 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); A.M.F. v. Tuscaloosa Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 75 So. 3d 1206, 1213 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011); J.C. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 986 So. 2d 1172, 1183 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); B.M. v. State, 895 So. 2d 319, 331 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004); R.L.B. v. Morgan Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 805 So. 2d 721, 725 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001); and D.P. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 571 So. 2d 1140, 1142 (Ala. Civ. App. 1990). 2190131 –- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. 2190132 –- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; § 1215-319, Ala. Code 1975; § 13A-6-130(a), Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990); Boshell v. Keith, 418 So. 2d 89, 92 (Ala. 1982); J.Y. v. Geneva Cty. Dep't of Human Res., [2180459, Aug. 9, 2019] So. 3d n. 2 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019); K.P. v. Etowah Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 43 So. 3d 602, 608 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); J.F.S. v. Mobile Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 38 So. 3d 75, 77–78 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009); J.C. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 986 So. 2d 1172, 1183 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); and B.M. v. State, 895 So. 2d 319, 331 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004). Moore, Donaldson, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., 2 concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.