W.A. v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 11/30/2018 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2018-2019 2170603 W.A. v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources. Appeal from Calhoun Juvenile Court (JU-17-487.02). THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990) Boshell v. Keith, 418 So. 2d 89, 92 (Ala. 1982); A.E.T., Jr. v. Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 49 So. 3d 1212, 1219 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); J.C. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 986 So. 2d 1172, 1183 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); D.M. v. Walker Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 919 So. 2d 1197, 1214 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005); A.N.S. v. K.C., 628 So. 2d 734, 735 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993); E.J.W. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 709 So. 2d 57, 59 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998); Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990); and A.N.S. v. K.C., 628 So. 2d 734, 735 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). 2170635 D.M v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources. Appeal from Calhoun Juvenile Court (JU-17-487.02). AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; § 1215-102(8), Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990) Boshell v. Keith, 418 So. 2d 89, 92 (Ala. 1982); N.G. v. Blount Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 216 So. 3d 1227, 1235 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); A.E.T., Jr. v. Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 49 So. 3d 1212, 1219 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); J.C. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 986 So. 2d 1172, 1183 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); D.M. v. Walker Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 919 So. 2d 1197, 1214 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005); A.N.S. v. 2170603 and 2170635 K.C., 628 So. 2d 734, 735 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993); E.J.W. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 709 So. 2d 57, 59 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998); Ex parte Beasley, 564 So. 2d 950, 954 (Ala. 1990); and A.N.S. v. K.C., 628 So. 2d 734, 735 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). Pittman, Thomas, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.