D. L. L. II v. B. J. and R. S. J.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 4/18/08 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2007-2008 _________________________ 2061156 _________________________ D.L.L. II v. B.J. and R.S.J. Appeal from Baldwin Juvenile Court (JU-06-854.01) THOMAS, Judge. D.L.L. II ("the father") appeals from the judgment of the Baldwin Juvenile Court awarding to B.J. and R.S.J. ("the maternal grandparents") custody of five-year-old D.L. ("the child"), subject to supervised visitation by the Because it was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal. father. 2061156 Although the parties have not raised the issue of jurisdiction to this court, we may consider the issue of jurisdiction ex mero motu. M.M. v. L.L. [Ms. 2060868, November 30, 2007] ___ So. 2d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); F.G. v. State Dep't of Human Res., [Ms. 2060613, November 16, 2007] ___ So. 2d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2007). An appeal from a juvenile court's judgment must be filed within 14 days of the entry of that judgment or within 14 days of the denial of a timely postjudgment motion filed pursuant to Rules 52, 55, or 59, Ala. R. Civ. P. See Rules 1(B) and 28(C), Ala. R. Juv. P., and Rule 4(a)(1)(E), Ala. R. App. P. See also F.G. v. State Dep't of Human Res., ___ So. 2d at ___. On August 23, 2006, the maternal grandparents filed a "petition for custody" and an "emergency petition for custody" in the juvenile court. The "petition for custody" alleged that the child's mother, who had been the child's primary caregiver, had died on August 5, 2006, and that the father was in a drug-rehabilitation program. Further, the petition alleged that the father had a history of drug use, had never been the primary caregiver of the child, had failed to support the child, and had been violent in the home. 2 The "emergency 2061156 petition for custody" contained the same allegations and, in addition to seeking custody of the child, sought exclusive use of the mother and father's marital home. The juvenile court ultimately held a hearing on June 26, 2007, at which it heard disputed, oral testimony and admitted several exhibits. On July entered a judgment awarding 25, 2007, the juvenile court the maternal grandparents custody of the child, subject to supervised visitation by the father. 1 On August 7, 2007, the father timely filed a postjudgment 1 In his principal brief on appeal, the father states that the July 25, 2007, order was entered on July 10, 2007. However, Rule 58(c), Ala. R. Civ. P., was amended, effective September 19, 2006, to provide, in pertinent part: "Entry of Order or Judgment. Upon rendition of an order or a judgment as provided in subdivision (a) of this rule, the clerk shall forthwith enter such order or judgment in the court record. An order or a judgment shall be deemed 'entered' within the meaning of these Rules and the Rules of Appellate Procedure as of the actual date of the input of the order or judgment into the State Judicial Information System." The case-action summary clearly shows that the order was entered in the State Judicial Information System on July 25, 2007. However, even if the order had been entered on July 10, 2007, the father's appeal would still be untimely. If the judgment had been entered on July 10, 2007, the father would have been required to file his postjudgment motion to suspend the time for filing his notice of appeal or to file his notice of appeal no later than July 24, 2007. 3 2061156 motion. law on Although That postjudgment motion was denied by operation of August the 21, 2007. juvenile See court Rule 1(B), purported to Ala. R. enter Juv. an P. order altering its previous order on August 24, 2007, it did not have jurisdiction to enter that order. 905 So. 2d 853, 856 (Ala. 2005). Id.; D.V.P. v. T.W.P., After the father's postjudgment motion was denied by operation of law, the father had 14 days (until September 4, 2007) to file his notice of appeal. The father's September 5, 2007, notice of appeal is untimely; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. Holmes v. Powell, 363 So. 2d 760, 762 (Ala. 1978) ("A timely filing of the notice of appeal is jurisdictional, ... the sanction to be applied for an untimely filing being dismissal) ; M.M. v. L.L., supra; and F.G. v. State Dep't of Human Res., supra. APPEAL DISMISSED. Thompson, P.J., and Pittman, Bryan, and Moore, JJ., concur. 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
