Hamilton v. State
Annotate this CasePursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant pled guilty of charges of conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine and endangering a child. As part of the plea agreement, Appellant agreed to cooperate with the State in providing information to assist the State in its investigation of other criminal activity. Appellant agreed that, if he did not meet this obligation, he would not object to the State’s motion under Wyo. R. Crim. P. 35(a) for an increase in his sentence. Several months after Appellant was sentenced, the State moved to modify his sentence, asserting that Appellant had breached the plea agreement by failing to cooperate. The district court granted the motion and imposed a new, more severe sentence. The Supreme Court vacated Appellant’s sentence, holding that, despite the parties’ plea agreement, the district court lacked jurisdiction to increase the sentence because Rule 35 does not give the trial court jurisdiction to increase a previously-imposed, legal sentence. Remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.