Union Bank, N.a., Appellant V. Raymond E. Pelzel, Et Al., Respondents (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE UNION BANK, N.A., as successor-in- No. 70869-4-1 interest to the FDIC as Receiver for Frontier Bank, ro» a Appellant, v. o t»o 5D -n CO RAYMOND E. PELZEL, an individual, and the marital community of RAYMOND E. and MERILEE PELZEL; PELZEL DEVELOPMENT, INC., a <-cr 3* §2o to £T>GO — Washington corporation; KAREL A. —<o \o z< PELTRAM, an individual, and the marital community of KAREL A. and AMY M. PELTRAM; KAREL Z. PELTRAM, an individual, and the marital community of KAREL Z. and UNPUBLISHED OPINION LIBUSE PELTRAM; RANDY L. CAMPADORE, an individual; and FILED: April 13,2015 CROSSMARK CAPITAL LLC, a Washington limited liability company, TATEURT Respondents. Per Curiam — Following the Washington Supreme Court's decision in Washington Federal v. Harvey Wn.2d -,, , 340 P.3d 846, 2015 WL 114165 (2015), the parties in this appeal filed a stipulation to the reversal of"the Superior Court's orders granting the defendant guarantors summary judgment and their attorneys' fees and the judgment resulting from those orders." The parties also No. 70869-4-1/2 stipulate that the trial court on remand shall determine the amount of any award for attorney fees and costs incurred in the appellate proceedings. We accept the parties' concession, reverse, and remand for further proceedings. FOR THE COURT: A^tsAf jf.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
