State Of Washington, Respondent V. Justin E.critchell, Appellant (Majority)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

-'0'^ i [; ¢S'l^TF P^ 1£-<'' C''"V",'r. ' ¢' ¢' 2011. APR-7 AH 9: 52 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69247-0- Respondent, v. JUSTIN ERIN CRITCHELL, Appellant. UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: APR - 7 2014 Per Curiam Justin Critchell appeals his convictions for third and fourth degree assault, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty to return a verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of each offense beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Ryan P. Moore, No. 69766-8 (Wash. February 18, 2014) and the cases cited therein. Affirmed. FOR THE COURT: OeckeJ^ <4xX

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.