Todd M. Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman TODD M. JACK v. Record No. 1021-13-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER John E. Wetzel, Jr., Judge (Todd M. Jack, pro se, on brief). No brief for appellee. Todd M. Jack appeals from a February 28, 2013 final order of the circuit court dismissing Jack s petition for judicial review of the Virginia Employment Commission s (VEC s) findings that he is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits and that he is liable to repay the VEC for unemployment compensation benefits he fraudulently obtained. The VEC filed a motion to dismiss Jack s appeal to this Court for Jack s failure to comply with numerous rules of this Court, and a motion for summary disposition pursuant to Rule 5A:27. We have reviewed the record, the opinions of the VEC deputy commissioner, the VEC appeals examiner, the VEC special examiner, and the circuit court s February 28, 2013 final order, and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the special examiner s opinions, as affirmed by the circuit court in its final order dismissing Jack s petition for judicial review of the VEC s decision. See In the matter of Jack, Comm n Decisions 105055-C and 105056-C (Oct. 3, 2012), aff d, Jack v. Virginia Emp't Comm n, Case * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. No. CL12000508-00 (Winchester Circ. Ct. Feb. 28, 2013). Appellant waived oral argument, and we summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.