July 18, 2000
Professor Richard A. Williamson Elizabeth Oyster, Esq.
College of William and Mary Geronimo Development Corp.
Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 606 25th Avenue, South
Suite 206
Mr. David M. George St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301
Government Relations Contracts
D5-20 Mead Data Central, Inc.
West Group Legal Data Collections
610 Opperman Drive 8891 Gander Creek Drive
Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Paul Fletcher, Publisher
Virginia Lawyers Weekly
106 North Eighth Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Re: David Edward Hartigan, III
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1002-98-4
Gentlemen and Ms. Oyster:
I am enclosing to you a copy of an order entered by this Court in
the above-referenced case on July 18, 2000. The Court has directed
that this order be published in the appropriate volumes. I appreciate
your cooperation in ensuring that publication is accomplished.
Sincerely,
Marty K. P. Ring
Deputy Clerk
MKPR:mfr
Enclosure
Tuesday 18th
July, 2000.
David Edward Hartigan, III, Appellant,
against Record No. 1002-98-4
Circuit Court No. 93324
Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.
Upon a Rehearing En Banc
Before Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Coleman,
Elder, Bray, Bumgardner, Humphreys and Senior Judge Cole
Vanessa M. Antoun, Assistant Public
Defender (Office of the Public
Defender, on brief), for appellant.
Thomas D. Bagwell, Senior Assistant
Attorney General (Mark L. Earley,
Attorney General, on brief), for
appellee.
A jury convicted David Edward Hartigan, III, of grand
larceny. On appeal, Hartigan contends (1) the trial judge erred
in admitting evidence that impermissibly commented on Hartigan's
exercise of his constitutional privilege against self-
incrimination and (2) that after the Commonwealth introduced in
the sentencing proceeding evidence of his prior convictions,
including the sentences for which he was parole eligible, the
trial judge erred in refusing to instruct the jury that parole
has been abolished. A panel of this
Court reversed the conviction. See Hartigan v. Commonwealth, 31
Va. App. 243, 522 S.E.2d 406 (1999). We granted a rehearing en
banc.
While this rehearing was pending, the Supreme Court
decided Fishback v. Commonwealth, ___ Va. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___
(2000), holding that, as to those offenses to which Code 53.1-
165.1 applies, "juries shall be instructed, as a matter of law,
on the abolition of parole for non-capital felony offenses
committed on or after January 1, 1995 pursuant to Code 53.1-
165.1." Id. at ___, ___ S.E.2d at ___. For that reason, and for
the reasons stated in the previous panel decision, the stay of
this Court's December 28, 1999 mandate is lifted, and we reverse
the conviction on both issues and remand for a new trial.
This order shall be published and certified to the
trial court.
A Copy,
Teste:
Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk
By:
Deputy Clerk
