State v. Tinker

Annotate this Case
State v. Tinker  (95-126); 165 Vt 548; 676 A.2d 785

[Opinion Filed 13-Mar-1996]


                               ENTRY ORDER

                      SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 95-126

                             MARCH TERM, 1996


State of Vermont              }              APPEALED FROM:
                              }
                              }              District Court of Vermont,
     v.                       }              Unit No. 2, Chittenden Circuit
                              }
                              }
Randall Tinker                }              DOCKET NO. 1013-3-93CnCr


       In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

       The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for acquittal for
  perjury, 13 V.S.A. ยง 2904.  Our law "requires that perjury be proved by the
  testimony of two witnesses, or by the testimony of one witness with
  independent corroborating evidence."  State v. Wheel, 155 Vt. 587, 607, 587 A.2d 933, 945 (1990).  Where, as here, the State presents only one witness
  to testify as to the falsity of defendant's statements, "`[t]he independent
  corroborating evidence must be equal in weight to the testimony of another
  witness, and it must be, by itself, inconsistent with the innocence of the
  defendant.'"  State v. Tonzola, 159 Vt. 491, 497, 621 A.2d 243, 246 (1993)
  (quoting People v. Fueston, 717 P.2d 978, 980 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985)
  (citation omitted), rev'd on other grounds, 749 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1988)).

       In the instant matter, the State failed to present independent
  evidence to corroborate the falsity of defendant's statements. 
  Consequently, defendant's conviction cannot stand, and a judgment of
  acquittal must be entered.

       Reversed; judgment of acquittal entered.

                              BY THE COURT:


                              _________________________________________
                              Frederic W. Allen, Chief Justice


                              _________________________________________
                              Ernest W. Gibson III, Associate Justice


                              _________________________________________
                              John A. Dooley, Associate Justice


                              _________________________________________
                              James L. Morse, Associate Justice
[ ]  Publish

[ ]  Do Not Publish                   _________________________________________
                              Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.