In re Lichtenberg

Annotate this Case
ENTRY_ORDER.93-430; 161 Vt. 614; 657 A.2d 168

[Filed 07-Dec-1993]

                                 ENTRY ORDER

                       SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 93-430

                             NOVEMBER TERM, 1993



 In re Andrew Lichtenberg, Esq.      }        Original Jurisdiction
                                     }
                                     }
                                     }        Professional Conduct Board
                                     }
                                     }        Docket No. 91-08


              In the above entitled cause the Clerk will enter:


      The recommended sanction is not approved.  The violations found warrant
 a six-month suspension, and respondent Andrew Lichtenberg is suspended from
 the practice of law for six months, commencing on January 1, 1994.  In addi-
 tion, the respondent shall also be placed on probation for a term of one year,
 commencing on July 1, 1994.  During that term of probation, respondent shall
 retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and
 achieve a passing grade under the prevailing Vermont standards.

                                    BY THE COURT:


                                    _______________________________________
                                    Frederic W. Allen, Chief Justice

                                    _______________________________________
                                    Ernest W. Gibson III, Associate Justice

                                    _______________________________________
                                    John A. Dooley, Associate Justice

                                    _______________________________________
                                    James L. Morse, Associate Justice
 [x]  Publish
                                    _______________________________________
 [ ]  Do Not Publish                Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice





Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.