R.E. v. B.B.
Annotate this CaseIn this case the juvenile court terminated Father's parental rights to T.E., his biological child, after finding that Father had abandoned T.E. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that, even if Father did not abandon T.E., there was another permissible ground to terminate Father's parental rights because it was apparent that Father made only "token efforts" to communicate with T.E. The Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding (1) the court of appeals erred in concluding that Father had abandoned T.E. because the court evaluated Father's rebuttal evidence under an incorrect standard; (2) the court of appeals erred in affirming the juvenile court on the alternative ground because it was not apparent on the record that Father made only "token efforts" to communicate with T.E.; and (3) the court of appeals was correct in upholding the juvenile court's use of Father's outbursts at the termination hearing as evidence because they were probative of whether termination of parental rights was in T.E.'s best interest. Remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.