State of Utah v. Woitock
Annotate this CaseIN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
----ooOoo----
State of Utah,
Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
David C. Woitock,
Defendant and Appellant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20030025-CA
F I L E D
(October 17, 2003)
2003 UT App 347
-----
Third District, Salt Lake Department
The Honorable William W. Barrett
Attorneys: David C. Woitock, Salt Lake City, Appellant Pro Se
-----
Before Judges Jackson, Bench, and Orme.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant David C. Woitock appeals his conviction of Speeding, an infraction, following a trial de novo in district court on appeal from a conviction in justice court. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary dismissal.
This case originated in the Holladay Justice Court. Woitock appeals the decision of the district court following a trial de novo. Utah Code Ann. ยง 78-5-120(7) (2002) states that "[t]he decision of the district court is final and may not be appealed unless the district court rules on the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance." "By enacting . . . section 78-5-120 . . . the Utah Legislature . . . specifically and intentionally limited the issues that may be appealed from a district court's judgment." State v. Hinson, 966 P.2d 273, 276 (Utah Ct. App. 1998). Accordingly, "absent an issue regarding the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance, the decision of the district court is final and this court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal thereof." Id. at 277.
Although Woitock asserted a violation of the constitutional requirements for the separation of church and state, his claim does not constitute a challenge to the constitutionality of a specific statute or ordinance. The district court did not rule on the constitutionality of any statute or ordinance.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction under section 78-5-120(7).
______________________________
Norman H. Jackson,
Presiding Judge
______________________________
Russell W. Bench, Judge
______________________________
Gregory K. Orme, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.