State of Utah v. Russell
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
State of Utah,
Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Ouray Russell,
Defendant and Appellant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20010791-CA
F I L E D
January 17, 2002
2002 UT App 14
-----
Third District, Salt Lake
Department
The Honorable Ann Boyden
Attorneys:
Victor Marshall Gordon,
Salt Lake City, for Appellant
Mark Shurtleff and Brett
J. DelPorto, Salt Lake City, for Appellee
-----
Before Judges Billings, Davis, and Thorne.
PER CURIAM:
This case is before the court on what appears to be an appeal from an order binding Appellant over to stand trial on criminal charges. Appellant has not provided a copy of the order from which he appeals. Appellant has also failed to file a docketing statement, and has not responded to this court's sua sponte notice of consideration for summary disposition. Appellee did file a response to the notice.
Because Appellant does not
appeal from a signed, final appealable order, this court does not have
jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Utah R. App. P. 3(a). Moreover,
Appellant has not sought permission to appeal an interlocutory order pursuant
to Rule 5 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, the appeal
is dismissed based on lack of jurisdiction without
prejudice to filing an appeal
upon obtaining a final order or judgment.
______________________________
Judith M. Billings,
Associate Presiding Judge
______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge
______________________________
William A. Thorne, Jr.,
Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.