Lee v. DWS

----ooOoo----

Kraig L. Lee,
Petitioner,

v.

Department of Workforce Services,
Workforce Appeals Board,
and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.,
Respondents.

MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)

Case No. 20020828-CA

F I L E D
November 29, 2002 2002 UT App 392 -----

Original Proceeding in this Court

Attorneys:
Kraig L. Lee, St. George, Petitioner Pro Se
Lorin R. Blauer, Salt Lake City, for Respondents -----

Before Judges Billings, Bench, and Thorne.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition pursuant to rule 10(a) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Respondents filed a response in support of the motion. Petitioner, however, did not file a response.

Through Petitioner's failure to respond, he has not presented any viable arguments as to how the Workforce Appeals Board erred. Petitioner has also failed to present any issues on appeal in his docketing statement. Consequently, Petitioner has failed to raise any issues that merit further proceedings or consideration on appeal.

Accordingly, we grant the sua sponte motion for summary disposition and affirm the decision of the Workforce Appeals Board.
 
 

______________________________
Judith M. Billings,
Associate Presiding Judge
 
 

______________________________
Russell W. Bench, Judge
 
 

______________________________
William A. Thorne Jr., Judge