McKeon v. Crump

Annotate this Case
McKeon v. Crump, Case No. 20010121-CA, Filed June 1, 2001 IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

----ooOoo----

Daniel C. McKeon and Lisa McKeon,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Kenneth Crump and Amy S. Crump,
Defendants, Appellees,
and Cross-appellants.

MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)

Case No. 20010121

F I L E D
June 1, 2001 2001 UT App 175  -----

Fourth District, Provo Division
The Honorable Fred D. Howard

Attorneys:
Nelson Abbott, Provo, for Appellants
Richard D. Bradford, Provo, for Appellees

-----

Before Judges Greenwood, Billings, and Davis.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' cross-appeal. Defendants' notice of cross- appeal was not filed within fourteen days of plaintiffs' notice of appeal as required by rule 4(d) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Defendants filed a timely motion for an extension of time in which to file their cross-appeal, but the trial court has not ruled on the motion. The authority to grant a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal is vested in the trial court alone. See Utah R. App. P. 4(e); Glezos v. Frontier Inv., 896 P.2d 1230, 1233-34 (Utah Ct. App. 1995).

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the cross-appeal is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a new notice of cross-appeal in the event that the trial court grants defendants' motion for extension of time. See Utah R. App. P. 4(e).
 
 

______________________________
Pamela T. Greenwood,
Presiding Judge
 
 

______________________________
Judith M. Billings, Judge
 
 

______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.