McKeon v. Crump
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
Daniel C. McKeon and Lisa
McKeon,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Kenneth Crump and Amy S.
Crump,
Defendants, Appellees,
and Cross-appellants.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20010121
F I L E D
June 1, 2001
2001 UT App 175
-----
Fourth District, Provo Division
The Honorable Fred D. Howard
Attorneys:
Nelson Abbott, Provo, for
Appellants
Richard D. Bradford, Provo,
for Appellees
-----
Before Judges Greenwood, Billings, and Davis.
PER CURIAM:
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' cross-appeal. Defendants' notice of cross- appeal was not filed within fourteen days of plaintiffs' notice of appeal as required by rule 4(d) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Defendants filed a timely motion for an extension of time in which to file their cross-appeal, but the trial court has not ruled on the motion. The authority to grant a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal is vested in the trial court alone. See Utah R. App. P. 4(e); Glezos v. Frontier Inv., 896 P.2d 1230, 1233-34 (Utah Ct. App. 1995).
Accordingly, the motion is
granted, and the cross-appeal is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice
to the filing of a new notice of cross-appeal in the event that the trial
court grants defendants' motion for extension of time. See Utah
R. App. P. 4(e).
______________________________
Pamela T. Greenwood,
Presiding Judge
______________________________
Judith M. Billings, Judge
______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.