In Re: ExxonMobil Corporation and Computershare Investor Services, LLCAppeal from County Court of Rusk County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-13-00139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION AND COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES, LLC, RELATORS § § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On August 7, 2013, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus filed by ExxonMobil Corporation and Computershare Investor Services, LLC. That opinion directed Respondent to vacate his order signed on April 25, 2013, granting the motion for turnover of assets filed by Vivian Suzanne Kinard, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Grace T. Eaton. The opinion also directed Respondent to issue an order denying Kinard s motion. Respondent has complied with our order and opinion of August 7, 2013. All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot. Opinion delivered September 6, 2013. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER 6, 2013 NO. 12-13-00139-CV IN RE: EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION AND COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES, LLC, Relators V. HON. CHAD W. DEAN, Respondent Appeal from the County Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 11-173A) On August 7, 2013, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus filed by ExxonMobil Corporation and Computershare Investor Services, LLC. That opinion directed Respondent to vacate his order signed on April 25, 2013, granting the motion for turnover of assets filed by Vivian Suzanne Kinard, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Grace T. Eaton. The opinion also directed Respondent to issue an order denying Kinard s motion. Respondent has complied with our order and opinion of August 7, 2013. All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.