In the Interest of M. P. H., a child--Appeal from 307th District Court of Gregg County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-10-00200-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST ' APPEAL FROM THE 307TH OF M.P.H., ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT A CHILD ' GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on May 28, 2010. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment. On June 24, 2010, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). She was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before July 26, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On July 21, 2010, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal. However, the amended notice did not cure the defect. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied). Opinion delivered July 30, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
