Pine Hollow, L.P. v. Estella Heskett--Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Gregg County

Annotate this Case
DISMISSAL FORM FOR CIVIL CASES ON ANT'S MOTION /SETTLEMENT NO. 12-03-00166-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

PINE HOLLOW, L.P., D/B/A

PINE HOLLOW MOBILE HOME PARK,

 
APPEAL FROM THE

APPELLANT

 

V.

 
COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF

ESTELLA HESKETT,

APPELLEE

 
GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

The parties hereto have filed a joint motion to vacate and render judgment pursuant to settlement. That motion has been signed by the attorneys for all parties and represents that the parties' agreement disposes of all issues presented for appeal. Because the parties have met the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), the motion is granted, the judgment of the trial court is vacated without regard to its merits, and the cause is dismissed with prejudice. The costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant.

 

Opinion delivered September 10, 2003.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

 
(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
SEPTEMBER 10, 2003
NO. 12-03-00166-CV
PINE HOLLOW, L.P., D/B/A
PINE HOLLOW MOBILE HOME PARK,
Appellant
V.
ESTELLA HESKETT,
Appellee
Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
of Gregg County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 2002-0577-C)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that all matters in controversy between the parties have been compromised, settled, and fully satisfied, and the Court having heard and considered said motion is of the opinion the same should be Granted.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the judgment of the trial court is Vacated and the appeal be, and the same is, hereby Dismissed with Prejudice; and that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the Appellant, Pine Hollow, L.P., d/b/a Pine Hollow Mobile Home Park; for which let execution issue, and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

 

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th day of September, 2003, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

 
PINE HOLLOW, L.P., D/B/A
PINE HOLLOW MOBILE HOME PARK, Appellant
NO. 12-03-00166-CV and Tr. Ct. Case Number 2002-0577-C
Opinion by Per Curiam.
ESTELLA HESKETT, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that all matters in controversy between the parties have been compromised, settled, and fully satisfied, and the Court having heard and considered said motion is of the opinion the same should be Granted.

 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the judgment of the trial court is Vacated and the appeal be, and the same is, hereby Dismissed with Prejudice; and that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the Appellant, Pine Hollow, L.P., d/b/a Pine Hollow Mobile Home Park; for which let execution issue, and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

 

WHEREAS, YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to observe the foregoing order of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

 

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the ______ day of __________________, 200_.

 

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

 

By:_______________________________

Deputy Clerk

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.