Jessica Gryseels v. Marina Vista Condominium Council of Co-Owners Association Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-18-00185-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ JESSICA GRYSEELS, Appellant, v. MARINA VISTA CONDOMINIUM COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez The appellant’s brief in the above cause was due on August 31, 2018. 1 On September 14, 2018, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been 1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)(c). NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice Delivered and filed the 11th day of October, 2018. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.