Sally Valadez a/k/a Sally Valadez Glenn v. Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group, PLLC and Jennifer H. Breazeale, M.D. Appeal from 284th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-15-00465-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ SALLY VALADEZ A/K/A SALLY VALADEZ GLENN, Appellant, v. KELSEY-SEYBOLD MEDICAL GROUP, PLLC AND JENNIFER H. BREAZEALE, M.D., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Sally Valadez a/k/a Sally Valadez Glenn, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 384th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 13-05-05499-CV.1 Appellant has filed an unopposed amended motion to dismiss the appeal and requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed amended motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 24th day of November, 2015. 1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.