JOE LANDRY v. VENTURA GOBELLAN JR.--Appeal from 24th District Court of Jackson County (per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-13-00315-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ JOE LANDRY, Appellant, v. VENTURA GOBELLAN JR., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Joe Landry, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, Ventura Gobellan Jr.. On August 5, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August 1, 2013, and that the deputy district clerk, Sharon Mathis, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On July 23, 2013, and August 5, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of the letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c). Appellant has failed to respond to this Court s notices and has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Delivered and filled the 5th day of September, 2013. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.