STEVE WIER, INC. v. ERNESTO GARCIA, GUADALUPE GARCIA, ANNA GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF EVIER GARCIA, EDGAR GARCIA AND ERIK GARCIA, DAVID RUMBLEY, JEFFREY WIGINGTON, WIGINGTON & RUMLEY, LLP, TONY BONILLA, AND BONILLA & CHAPA, P.C.--Appeal from 343rd District Court of Bee County (per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBERS 13-11-00737-CV AND 13-11-00738-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG STEVE WIER, INC., Appellant, v. ERNESTO GARCIA, GUADALUPE GARCIA, ANNA GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF EVIER GARCIA, EDGAR GARCIA AND ERIK GARCIA, DAVID RUMBLEY, JEFFREY WIGINGTON, WIGINGTON & RUMLEY, LLP, TONY BONILLA, AND BONILLA & CHAPA, P.C., Appellees. On appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam These appeals were abated by this Court on January 20, 2012, to allow the parties to mediate. These causes are now before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have settled and compromised their differences. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, these cases are hereby REINSTATED. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeals. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeals are hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeals at the parties request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 4th day of October, 2012. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.