CARLOS PASOL LEVITAS, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALICIA P. LEVITAS, DECEASED, AND AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SARA PASOL FACTOR, DECEASED v. PEDRO L. BARRAZA, MARIA ELENA BARRAZA, AND BARRAZA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP--Appeal from 357th District Court of Cameron County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-10-00424-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ CARLOS PASOL LEVITAS, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALICIA P. LEVITAS, DECEASED, AND AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SARA PASOL FACTOR, DECEASED, Appellant, v. PEDRO L. BARRAZA, MARIA ELENA BARRAZA, AND BARRAZA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-10-4369-E. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 21st day of October, 2010. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
