KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER v. ARACELY RAMOS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR JUAN RAMOS, OFELIA RAMOS, AND AMANDA RAMOS--Appeal from 398th District Court of Hidalgo County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-09-00593-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL, Appellant, v. ARACELY RAMOS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR JUAN RAMOS, OFELIA RAMOS, AND AMANDA RAMOS, Appellees. _____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Knapp Medical Center Hospital, perfected an appeal from an interlocutory Order Denying Dr. Loan Vu and Knapp Medical Center s Objections to Plaintiffs 120-Day Expert Reports and Motion to Dismiss rendered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, on October 6, 2009, in trial court cause number C-765-09-1. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appellees have agreed to voluntarily dismiss all direct negligence claims against it. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal without prejudice. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d) ( Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. ). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 20th day of May, 2010. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.